WHAT ABOUT PROOFREADING?
Proofreading would be an excellent way to get your "foot in the door," so to
You don't need any special software to do that portion of the work, as long
as you have software to be able to open text files, because all the CAT
software has the capability of producing ASCII format jobs, then all you
to do is send back an errata sheet with the corrections or the actual
printed-out transcript if the reporters are in your area. I no longer work
for reporters in my own area (my biggest reporter source has now joined me
the scoping/proofreading arena), but I send corrections back either with the
errata sheet or via fax, when I do proofreading.
Of course, with proofreading you have to read a lot of pages to earn what
can earn as a scopist - but it also takes less time because the jobs that
receive should be as near perfect as possible at the outset, whereas when
are scoping you're dealing with raw material that you have to figure out
untranslates (words that don't translate into English with the reporter's
CAT software) and punctuation - which sometimes is hard to do, misstrokes of
the reporter that can sometimes take forever to figure out (sigh), etc.,
Whatever you choose to do, do it well and make yourself indispensable so
the reporters will wonder what in the world they ever did without having you
working for them before this. :)
In order to proofread, does one need to have a CAT system?
No. You could proof by receiving an ASCII (text) file and either
proofing it in a word processor or printing it and marking the
corrections on paper. If you don't print the job, you would need to
work out with the reporter whether they want all corrections flagged or
just ones you think they might question. Or you could give them a list
of corrections with line and page numbers and then they would make the
>>to get the feel for working over the internet...
I think you could quickly become comfortable receiving and sending jobs
via the Internet.
>>when you proof, do you print out the entire transcript or just proof from
I personally proof the job right in the CAT system. Others feel they
can spot errors better by printing the job.
I want to mention that .10/pg. is way too low for proofreading. A more
typical charge would be .25 and up. (I charge .40)
Back to List of Topics
Web page and original graphics by
Mazco. All rights reserved.